Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO – Detailed Specs Comparison (2026)

Closed design. Total battery life up to 38 hours. Six microphones for best speech quality. Customised settings via the beyerdynamic app. Active noise cancellation and transparency mode. Splash-proof according to IP54 certification and sweat resistant. Qi-compatible charging case for wireless charging and fast charging. Wearing detection (automatic playback / stop when inserting / removing the earphones). Multi-point BluetoothÂ® 5.3. for simultaneous connection of multiple BluetoothÂ® devices.

Stay-Aware Mode. Noise-Isolating Fit. 36 Hours of Battery Life. Call, Track & Volume Control. Rapid Charge 10 Min = 3 Hours. Built-in Tileâ„¢ Finding Technology. Flat-Folding & Collapsible Design. GO-ANYWHERE DESIGN : Thanks to rugged, innovative hinges that both fold flat and collapse, Hesh Evo easily goes wherever you go. EASY, CONVENIENT CONTROLS : Simple, intuitive buttons let you take calls, adjust volume and change tracks without ever touching your phone. COMFORT FOR HOURS : With an ultralight headband and soft pads that fully surround your ears, Hesh Evo is one of the most comfortable headphones youÃ¢ll ever put on. DONÃ¢T WORRY, YOUÃ¢VE GOT TILE : Hesh Evo features built-in Tile finding technology. If you ever misplace your headphones, you can easily Ã¢ringÃ¢ them from the Tile App. So what might have seemed lost, is now quickly found.

Key Differences

In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. There is a noticeable difference in weight (51.33 GM vs 213 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 and Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active Noise Cancellation vs Sound Isolation), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 uses Bluetooth 5.3 while Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO supports Bluetooth 5.0, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32±15% Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. The driver size differs between the two (10 mm vs 40 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. The frequency response differs (20Hz - 40KHz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 and Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. Battery life varies between the two (10 / 28 / 38 Hours vs 36 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge.

Verdict: Choosing between Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 and Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 10 / 28 / 38 Hours vs 36 Hours
Noise Cancelling: Active Noise Cancellation vs Sound Isolation
Driver Size: 10 mm vs 40 mm
Bluetooth: 5.3 vs 5.0
Weight: 51.33 GM vs 213 GM

Compare Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 with:

Compare Skullcandy HESHÂ® EVO with:

Key Differences

Top Differences