Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
JBL TUNE 205
Rs.999.00

Skullcandy X5SHFZ-826
Rs.1,000.00
Brand
JBL
Skullcandy
Model No
TUNE 205
X5SHFZ-826
Wired / Wireless
Wired Headphone Specification
Wired Headphone Specification
Headphone Type
In Ear
On Ear
 
Magnet Type
Dynamic
Neodymium
Driver Diameter
12.5 mm
30 mm
Impedance
32 ohm
32 ohms
Sensitivity
100dB
NA
Frequency Response
20 Hz - 20000 kHz
20 - 20,000 Hz
Maximum Power Input
NA
NA
Noise Cancelling
NA
No
 
Available Colors
Black, Grey, Pink, Gold
Purple
Connector Plating
3.5 mm
3.5 mm Gold Plated Plug
Cable
Tangle- Free Flat Cable
1.2 m
Weight
14.3 gm
NA
Other Features
JBL Pure Bass sound.
Tangle-free flat cable.
Comfort-fit ergonomics earbuds.
Premium metalized ear-housing.
One Button Universal Remote with Mic.
Powerful, pure bass sound. Now in a takeaway version.
The TUNE205 can be conveniently stored in the soft carrying pouch and carried along.
These headphones reproduce that same JBL sound, punching out bass that’s both deep and powerful.
- Good sound quality and good bass.

Compare JBL TUNE 205 with:

Compare Skullcandy X5SHFZ-826 with:

Key Differences

Skullcandy X5SHFZ-826 and JBL TUNE 205 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (No vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Skullcandy X5SHFZ-826 and JBL TUNE 205 are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. Impedance levels vary (32 ohms vs 32 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. The driver size differs between the two (30 mm vs 12.5 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. There is a noticeable difference in weight (NA vs 14.3 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. The frequency response differs (20 - 20,000 Hz vs 20 Hz - 20000 kHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

  • Noise Cancelling: No vs NA
  • Driver Size: 30 mm vs 12.5 mm
  • Weight: NA vs 14.3 gm
  • Impedance: 32 ohms vs 32 ohm