
![]() Philips TAT1150BK Rs.3,999.00 | ![]() Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones Rs.3,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesThere is a noticeable difference in weight (147 gm vs 43 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Battery life varies between the two (22 Hours vs 55 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones and Philips TAT1150BK offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (30 Ohm±15% vs 32 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1150BK supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. The driver size differs between the two (40 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. If you're comparing Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones and Philips TAT1150BK, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Verdict: Choosing between Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones and Philips TAT1150BK depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||