Philips TAT1169BL vs Unix CHARM – Specs, Price & Comparison (2026)

Reliable Connection : Bluetooth connection provides a stable, uninterrupted listening and calling experience. High-Quality Sound : Experience warm, natural sound with dynamic bass boost and 12mm drivers for deep bass and clear calls. Comfort & Controls : Designed for a snug fit with interchangeable silicone ear tips, plus easy on-ear touch controls for convenience. Durable & Splash-Resistant : IPX4 rated, offering protection from sweat and splashes, making them perfect for workouts or outdoor use. Long Playtime & Convenience : Enjoy up to 55 hours of playtime with a pocket-sized charging case, ensuring your earbuds are always ready to go.

Sweatproof & Extra Bass. Music Time Upto 20 Hours. Active Voice Assistant Instantly. Rich Sound With Deep Bass : Experience high-fidelity audio with enhanced bassâ€”perfect for music lovers. ENC For Clear Calls : Environmental Noise Cancellation ensures clear and professional-grade communication on the go. Voice Changer with 4 Modes : Unique voice modulation feature makes calls fun and functional with multiple voice effects. Magnetic Earbuds & Sweat Resistant : Tangle-free storage and durable build make it perfect for workouts and outdoor use. Up To 48 Hours Of Playtime : Long-lasting battery supports non-stop entertainment, work, or travel without frequent charging.

Key Differences

The driver size differs between the two (12 mm vs 12.5 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Philips TAT1169BL uses Bluetooth 5.3 while Unix CHARM supports Bluetooth 5.2, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (16 Ohms vs 20 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. If you're comparing Philips TAT1169BL and Unix CHARM, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Philips TAT1169BL and Unix CHARM offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Environmental Noise Cancelling vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Both models provide a wide frequency range, delivering a balanced audio experience across different types of content. There is a noticeable difference in weight (38 GM vs 100 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. Battery life varies between the two (7 + 48 Hours vs 48 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge.

Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 7 + 48 Hours vs 48 Hours
Noise Cancelling: Environmental Noise Cancelling vs NA
Bluetooth: 5.3 vs 5.2
Weight: 38 GM vs 100 GM
Impedance: 16 Ohms vs 20 Ohms

Compare Philips TAT1169BL with:

Compare Unix CHARM with:

Key Differences

Top Differences