SHURE SRH1440 vs Beyerdynamic DT 280 MK II – Key Differences & Best Choice (2026)

Individually tested and serialized. Open back circumaural design promotes natural audio response. Legendary Shure durability withstands the rigors of everyday use. Impedance optimised for connectivity to most portable audio devices. Replaceable velour ear pads with high density, slow recovery foam for exceptional comfort. Open-back, circumaural design for exceptionally natural sound, wide stereo image, and increased depth of field. Fully adjustable, premium padded headband with steel frame and sleek, ergonomic design for hours of listening comfort. Additional oxygen-free copper cable and zippered storage case provide years of listening enjoyment and convenient storage. Dual-exit cables with gold-plated MMCX connectors provide secure connection and detachability for easy storage or replacement.

Made in Germany. Available Variations DT 280 MK II / 80 ohms DT 280 MK II / 250 ohms More flexible, swivelling gooseneck for optimum positioning. High-performance neodymium magnet system for excellent playback precision. Single-ear headset with dynamic microphone for broadcast and intercom ( closed ). High-quality dynamic microphone with hypercardioid characteristic ( very high feedback prevention ). All versions of the DT 280 are supplied without a connection cable. Please order the desired connection cable at the same time.

Key Differences

Beyerdynamic DT 280 MK II and SHURE SRH1440 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs CVC), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. The frequency response differs (10 - 30.000 Hz vs 15 Hz - 27000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Impedance levels vary (250 ohm vs 37 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 40 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. There is a noticeable difference in weight (170 g vs 343 Gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. Beyerdynamic DT 280 MK II and SHURE SRH1440 are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features.

Verdict: Choosing between Beyerdynamic DT 280 MK II and SHURE SRH1440 depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Noise Cancelling: NA vs CVC
Driver Size: NA vs 40 mm
Weight: 170 g vs 343 Gm
Impedance: 250 ohm vs 37 ohm

Compare SHURE SRH1440 with:

Compare Beyerdynamic DT 280 MK II with:

Key Differences

Top Differences